Social Media Persuasion Paper

For my class entitled Theories of Persuasion, I wrote a persuasion paper regarding social media. We were asked to select a topic from one of the chapters in our book to focus a communication theory on that we later would modify. The paper is a culmination of the theoretical and scholarly ideas on persuasion we encountered throughout the semester in the class. Each scholarly article we used was required to be summarized and critiqued accounting for the overall value. We also were asked to draw on our own experiences to make sense of what we learned as well as develop our own theory of persuasion. This paper demonstrates my skills for responding to directions accordingly, ability to come up with my own creative ideas, writing skills based off of the style of the paper, and my ability to conduct research appropriately.

Social Media Persuasion

            I chose to conduct research on social media persuasion and from there modify an already existing theory to further strengthen the theory as a whole. Research stated previously conducted studies and the final results the authors concluded from them. The research was examined in terms of Uses and Gratification Theory, which I later transformed into a new theory of my own entitled Scavenger Hunt Theory.
The first article I referenced is entitled Social Identity and Perceptions of Media Persuasion: Are We Always Less Influenced than Others? This article was written by Julie M. Duck, Michael A. Hogg, and Deborah J. Terry. This article discusses how people typically perceive negative media content, such as violence, to have more impact on others than on themselves. The authors referred to this as being “third person effect” (Duck, Hogg, & Terry, 1999). This article also examined the perceived effects of positive content, such as, public-service advertisements and also the moderating role of social identities amongst them (Duck, Hogg, & Terry, 1999). The authors examined students' perceptions of how they felt concerning the impact of AIDS advertisements on self in a few different ways. “Low identifiers displayed the typical third-person effect, whereas high identifiers were more willing to acknowledge impact on themselves and the student in-group” (Duck, Hogg, & Terry, 1999). The authors extended their research further and concluded that when influence was “acceptable within the in-group, high identifiers perceived self and students as more influenced than nonstudents” (Duck, Hogg, & Terry). Overall, this article looks at both negative and positive media content and draws conclusions from them.
            This article by Duck, Hogg, and Terry was very insightful and consisted of well-involved research; however, I occasionally found the article hard to understand because of the word usage considering I did not know the meaning of some of the words that the authors chose to use. I liked how the article described that people are unique in their own ways and some live by this whereas some other view themselves as primarily being part of a group. This makes up one’s social identity in which is influenced by the media and also social media. I have seen things like this happen first hand, through experiences from high school. Some classmates were so caught up in being a part of their groups and would tend to fade away from what makes them a unique individual because of convention.
            The next article I chose to reference was entitled Political Persuasion on Social Media: Tracing Direct and Indirect Effects of News Use and Social Interaction. This article was written by Trevor Diehl, Brian Weeks, and Homero Gil de Zúñiga. The author’s collaboratively showed how expression of news media information throughout social media sites has been “linked to pro-democratic political behaviors” throughout their article (Diehl, Weeks, & Zúñiga, 2015). However, most people use social media for non-political purposes; for example, staying connected with friends/family, sharing pictures/videos, or to fill boredom by browsing news feeds. “The authors indicate these behaviors may also have democratic benefits, by means of political expression in social media” (Diehl, Weeks, & Zúñiga, 2015). The study that they conducted, observed how social interaction and news-seeking behaviors within social media sites lead to “diverse networking, exposure to dissenting political opinion, and ultimately reconsidering and changing one’s political views” (Diehl, Weeks, & Zúñiga, 2015). The study proved that most users tend to build and maintain friend networks, which create a purposeful space for political persuasion to take place driven by word-of-mouth.
            This article was very informative and well-written. I agree with the majority of points that they were attempting to prove throughout their research and study. Observing people’s perceptions of news influence from social media is very interesting to me, because that is a major topic of discussion today, as social media is becoming increasingly popular amongst all different age groups and businesses.
            The last article I chose to reference is entitled, Authors Influencing Others to Follow: An Analysis of a Social Media Platform through the Framework of Persuasion Theory. This article was written by one author, named Philip Rothschild. He discussed through a case study, how “authors can use scientifically proven persuasion techniques to influence visitors to reply to their online requests” (Rothschild, 2014). This idea comes from the author's social media platform. The case study asked people to visit a social profile, comment on a blog, provide a review, share a link, join the tribe, or buy a book, and other things similar to the previous. The author defined social media platform then examined some of the elements of a successful social media platform. To conclude his research, he draws “conclusions on how these features may influence a response to one of many requests” (Rothschild, 2014).
            This article definitely kept my interest and made me want to continue learning about this viewpoint of social media. It was interesting that the persuasive techniques were actually scientifically proven. I also like how Rothschild used things like blogs and reviews in examining the case study. I do not personally have a lot of experience with dealing with blogs or reviews through the use of social media; however, I found that approach was very effective. Overall, I liked this author’s way of getting his point across concerning the topic at hand.
            This particular area of research regarding social media and its influences on persuasion contains a variety of things that would be evaluated into the future. I could see Snapchat being something that would provide a future study. Snapchat could have the ability to influence perceptions of trust; for example, when Snapchat had the top three “best friends” viewable to all. The viewable “best friends” section raised many problems among romantic relationships. This section would not seem like a big deal to many, but it definitely caused issues and could be something that one could form a study from. One could ask why Snapchat should have a “best friend” feature and why it influenced or persuaded trust/distrust in relationships.
Another future study could be a study based on how social interactions could differ in regards to arguments of controversial subjects. One could conduct a study that shows the difference of how one responds to a controversial post on social media compared to how one responds to a controversial issue face-to-face. This could be studied under spiral of silence theory to see if there is any trend in theories concerning the different responses of individuals between the two forms of communication.
            A theory I would apply to my research would be Uses and Gratification Theory, although I would modify this theory by adding a 5th aspect to it and renaming it. The theory is already divided into 4 aspects, surveillance, curiosity, diversion, and personal identity. I would rename this theory by calling it Scavenger Hunt Theory. I would give it this name because the theory explores all the possibilities of why one using social media, similar to how things are explored throughout a scavenger hunt. I would create the 5th aspect of the theory and call it F.O.D. which would stand for fear of disconnect. The 5th aspect of the theory would mean someone uses social media sites because they are concerned to a high degree that they will feel disconnected from their friends/family. In other words, they are afraid of feeling left out and they will feel this when their friends make statements, such as, “did you see that video John posted last night?” Their other friends know what was meant by that question because they have those social media sites when one person may not. I came up with this idea through discussions I recall having with my cousin last year. She had told me that she really wanted to delete her Facebook because she hated the amount of time she spent on it, although, she stated that she was scared to do this because all of her friends used it. She also stated that since all of her friends had it, that she would feel like she was missing out on everything; for example, missing out on hearing about certain events or upcoming parties. I imagine that I would feel similarly if I were to delete my social media accounts. I can see this being a common trend among high school or college age kids, or even adults for similar reasons. A survey could be conducted from social media users to prove how many people actually feel the same way as my cousin did. This theory would be complete after this modification and would cover all aspects of decisions people make regarding how often and why people use their social media.   
            To conclude my findings, social media is an increasingly popular thing among all ages and can affect almost everyone’s lives in today’s society. I developed a new communication theory that I entitled the Scavenger Hunt Theory, which covers all aspects of one’s social media use today and how it relates to persuasion. I also developed a 5th aspect of this theory entitled F.O.D. My research has given me a new way of viewing social media persuasion and its overall effects.



References
Diehl, T., Weeks, B. E., & Gil de Zuniga, H. (2015). Political Persuasion on Social Media: Tracing Direct and Indirect Effects of News Use and Social Interaction. New Media & Society, DOI: 10.1177/1461444815616224.
Duck, J. M., Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (1999). Social Identity and Perceptions of Media Persuasion: Are we always less influenced than others? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(9), 1879-1899. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00156.x.

Rothschild, P. C. (2014). Authors Influencing Others to Follow: An Analysis of a Social Media Platform through the Framework of Persuasion Theory. MEIEA Journal, 14(1), 251.

No comments:

Post a Comment